How do atheists contradict themselves in their description of the historical environment of Makkah to serve their misconceptions?

Contemporary atheist discourse manifests a type of methodological contradiction and cognitive instability, where the historical context is manipulated to serve an immediate polemical purpose without the slightest regard for scientific constants or objective integrity.

This path is clearly evident when attempting to challenge the source of the Noble Qur'an. When the skeptic intends to claim that the Prophet ﷺ derived the material of the Qur'an from human sources, you find him depicting Makkah as if it were a global crossroads of sciences and cultures, and a metropolis teeming with knowledge that allows for borrowing and learning.

However, this proposition changes entirely when the skeptic moves to another context. If he wishes to brand the Prophet ﷺ or his followers with ignorance or backwardness, Makkah is transformed in his discourse into an isolated Bedouin environment, whose people know nothing but herding and living in tents, lacking the most basic elements of civilization and knowledge.

This oscillation between two extremes reveals the absence of an intellectual foundation and scientific conscience; it confirms that the goal is not to reach historical truth, but merely a desperate attempt to twist the facts to serve the misconception presented at that moment.